Skip to main content

HMIL Shareholding (Training and Development-1994) Trust vs ITO

Case No: I.T.A. No. 3891/Mum/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Date: 3 Oct 2024

Parties Involved

appellantHMIL Shareholding (Training and Development-1994) Trust
respondentITO, Ward – 6(1)(1), Mumbai

Facts Summary

The case involves an appeal by the HMIL Shareholding (Training and Development-1994) Trust against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on 11/06/2024. The Trust, an employee benefit trust of Ion Exchange India Ltd, disputes the tax rate applied to its income by the Centralised Processing Centre (CPC). The CPC had taxed the Trust's income at the Maximum Marginal Rate, while the Trust sought to be taxed at slab rates. The Trust filed an appeal against this decision, which was dismissed by the CIT(A) as it was filed beyond the statutory time limit. The Trust subsequently filed a rectification application under section 154 of the Act, which was granted by the CPC on 18.09.2024, thereby rendering the appeal before the Tribunal infructuous.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the Ld Assessing Officer and the Ld First Appellate Authority erred in treating the appellant as an Association of Person.
  • 2. Whether the Ld Assessing Officer and the Ld First Appellate Authority erred in determining the tax liability of the Appellant at Maximum Marginal Rate (MMR).
  • 3. Whether the Ld Assessing Officer and the Ld First Appellate Authority erred in computing the tax liability of the Appellant by applying section 167B of the Act, without appreciating the fact that the appellant is not an Association of Person and merely acting as a representative.
  • 4. Whether the Ld Assessing Officer and the Ld First Appellate Authority erred in not computing the tax liability of the Appellant under section 164(1) of the Act read with proviso (iv), at the slab rates.
  • 5. Whether the Ld. Addi/JCIT(A) has erred in holding the delay in filing of the appeal by the Appellant as without 'sufficient cause', and dismissing the appeal without any discussion on merits.
  • 6. Whether the Ld. Addi/JCIT(A) has erred in not rectifying the mistake that had crept in while filing the Return of Income by the accountants of Appellant.

1 further legal issue analysed in the full judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning