HITCHKI CREATION PVT. LTD. VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MEERUT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
A search and seizure operation under section 132 was conducted on 27.11.2014 in the case of Maconns, Meenu and Yadav Singh Group, wherein certain incriminating documents were found and seized relating to the assessee. Subsequently, a notice under section 153C was issued on 27.06.2016. The assessee filed its return showing income of Rs. 4,57,650/-. Thereafter, notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued, and the Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment by making an addition of Rs. 65,57,300/- on account of unexplained investment in immovable property under section 68 of the Act and disallowance of Rs. 60,000/- on interest on loan. The AO noted that the registered sale deed pertaining to the immovable property was found and that the share applicants and lenders were bogus/non-existent. Consequently, the income of the assessee was assessed at Rs. 70,74,950/-. Aggrieved by this, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who confirmed the additions in his impugned order.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of the Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction under section 153C and passing the impugned order.
- 2. Whether the assessment framed under section 153C of the Act is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case.
- 3. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 65,57,300/- under section 68 of the Act.
- 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 60,000/- on interest on loan.
- 5. Whether the Ld. AO erred in holding that interest on loan debited to profit & loss account are not genuine.
- 6. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the Ld. AO in passing the impugned assessment order without requisite approval under section 153D.
2 further legal issues analysed in the full judgement.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
DCIT, Central Circle-1 vs M/s Dharampal Premchand Ltd.
Delhi Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly AllowedShri Sardar Patel Co-operative Credit Society Ltd vs ITO
Ahmedabad benchVidur Chharia Vs. DCIT/ACIT, Central Circle, Ghaziabad
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedPHI SEEDS PVT. LTD. (Now known as Corteva Agriscience Seeds Private Limited) Vs DCIT, CIRCLE 19(2), New Delhi
Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2012-13AllowedVikas Motiram Desai Vs ITO, Ward – 22(3)(5)
Allen Petrochemicals Pvt Ltd
Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi benchAY 2021-22Allowed