Hirenkumar Hasmukhbhai Mistry vs The ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

Hirenkumar Hasmukhbhai Mistry, an appellant, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2011-12. The appeal was filed 7 days past the deadline due to a communication gap caused by a change in counsel. The appellant argued that the reopening of his assessment was erroneous and that the addition of Rs.12,07,700/- was unjustified. The respondent, the Income Tax Officer, supported the order of the lower authorities, stating that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to support his claims. The appellant also requested that his income be estimated based on commission income or peak credit.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the reopening of the assessment was erroneous.
• 2. Whether the addition of Rs.12,07,700/- was justified.
• 3. Whether the addition of Rs.12,07,700/- was justified without considering the rotation of funds.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Bhagawan Ram Sharma vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 3(1), Gangtok

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Inder Mohan Singh Saluja Vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Shakila Begum Vs ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench

• Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'D' Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench

• Lalchand Shankarlal Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Thane

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2014-15Allowed