Skip to main content

Harish Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer

Case No: ITA No.1189/Del/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘B’: New Delhi
Date: 3/24/2025

Parties Involved

appellantHarish Gupta
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-44(3), Delhi

Facts Summary

The assessee, Harish Gupta, filed his income tax return after the due date, which was treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO had information that the assessee deposited a large sum of cash during the demonetization period and other cash deposits in the previous year. Since the assessee did not file the return on time, the AO completed the assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The AO treated the cash deposits as unexplained money under section 69A and added the ent

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the profit rate of 8% applied by the CIT(A) on the cash deposits is reasonable.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning