Harish Chanana vs ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Harish Chanana, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) pertaining to the Assessment Year 2007-08. The appeal arose from the order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 21.12.2009 under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the invalidity of the assessment order, the erroneous confirmation of additions made by the assessing officer, and the lack of proper opportunity provided to the appellant. The assessee claimed that the return of income was not filed with his consent and that his wife, who was suffering from cancer, was unable to explain the case before the assessing officer and CIT(A). The Assessing Officer proceeded to pass an ex-parte assessment order due to the absence of cooperation from the assessee and the lack of documentary evidence. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) dismissed the appeal as the assessee did not produce any evidences on record.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Invalidity of the assessment order
• 2. Erroneous confirmation of additions made by the assessing officer
• 3. Lack of proper opportunity provided to the appellant

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Shri Devisingh Narayansingh Chundavad vs Income Tax Officer-30(1)(2)

  Mumbai bench

• Dhananjoy Das Adhikari Vs ITO Ward-27(2), Haldia

  Kolkata benchAY 2017-2018Allowed

• ITA Nos.303 to 305/Ind/2024

  Indore bench

• Nitin Jain vs ACIT

  Delhi 'E' Bench: New Delhi benchAY 2014-15Allowed

• R. Shanmugam Vs. The Income Tax Officer

  Chennai bench

• Bhavika Bhuwalka Vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed