Skip to main content

Hans Raj vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Case No: ITA No.3937/DEL/2023 (A.Y.2017-18)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'SMC', Delhi
Date: 3/5/2025

Parties Involved

appellantHans Raj
respondentJoint Commissioner of Income Tax

Facts Summary

The assessee, Hans Raj, transferred a residential house to his mother-in-law, Smt. Chander Kala, without any financial transaction. The property was originally purchased by Hans Raj's father-in-law, with part of the purchase consideration sourced through a loan taken by Hans Raj from Punjab National Bank. In 2016, the property was transferred to Smt. Chander Kala. The sale deed erroneously mentioned a cash consideration of Rs. 24,21,000/-. The Assessing Officer levied a penalty under Section 271

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
  • 2. Whether the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is justified.

Precedents Relied Upon

4 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Hans Raj vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax - Opakhya | Opakhya