Govinda Kumar Sarkar Vs ITO Ward-3(2), Purulia

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Govinda Kumar Sarkar, against the order dated 08.07.2025 passed by the ld.Addl/JCIT(A)-7, Delhi for the assessment year 2015-2016. The assessee's appeal before the ld.CIT(A) was dismissed on account of a delay of 3126 days in filing the appeal. The assessee, a retired employee, argued that he did not have online access and was not properly advised by his consultant. He prayed that the delay may be condoned and the appeal disposed of on merits. The respondent, represented by Shri Abhijit Adhikari, Sr. DR, supported the orders of the ld. AO and ld. CIT(A).…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the delay of 3126 days in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(A) should be condoned.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• Suneet Kapoor Vs. ACIT

  Delhi Bench ‘G’ New Delhi benchAY 2012-13Partly Allowed

• Shreya Dey Sarkar Vs. I.T.O., Ward-2(4), Raiganj

  Kolkata ‘D’ Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Sunil Bhagat Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1), Gangtok

  Kolkata benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Nilesh Ratnakar Deshpande vs. ACIT

  C'' Bench: Bangalore benchAY 2011-12Partly Allowed

• Netra Pradeep Rural Eye Trust vs. ITO, Ward1(1), Exmpt, Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2021-22Allowed

• Micky Metals Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)

  C Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2022-23Allowed