Gollo Tara vs ITO Ward, North Lakhimpur
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee deposited a sum of Rs. 18,00,000/- during the demonetization period in her bank account. The assessee did not file her return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Notice under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 13.03.2018, and a final notice was issued on 21.05.2019. The jurisdiction was transferred to the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Tezpur. The assessee filed a written submission on 25.09.2019. The Assessing Officer observed substantial cash deposits and issued a show-cause on 15.11.2019. The assessee did not respond, leading to the assessment of unexplained money under section 144 of the Act. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income-Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which was dismissed. The assessee then filed an appeal before the Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi is bad in law and on facts?
- 2. Whether the assessee was given a reasonable opportunity to be heard?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Surinder Bhandari vs. ITO, Ward 2(3) Ghaziabad
Delhi benchKOSC Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, circle-4(1), Kolkata
Kolkata benchAY 2016-17 & 2017-18AllowedKrishna Strategic Services Private Limited vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedSmt. Jawahar Nazeem Vs. The Income Tax Officer
Cochin benchSikha Datta vs. Jurisdictional Assessing Officer
SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2015-16AllowedReshma Harbakhsh Singh through Legal Heir Vikaramaditya Singh VS DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi benchAY 2018-19Allowed