GAYATREE APPLIANCES LIMITED VS. ITO, WARD 10(1)
Case No: ITA No. 1234/Del/2024
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI)
Date: 3/19/2025
Parties Involved
appellantGAYATREE APPLIANCES LIMITED
respondentITO, WARD 10(1)
Facts Summary
This appeal has been filed by GAYATREE APPLIANCES LIMITED against the order dated 01.02.2024 passed by the NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. The appellant's counsel argued that the CIT(A) passed the order without giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and did not decide the matter on the merits. The respondent's counsel relied on the orders of the authorities below.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the CIT(A) passed the order without giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
GAURAV GUPTA VS. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2019-20AllowedDEEPAK COMMUNICATION VS. ITO, WARD 60(6)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedZEBA URFI VS. ITO, WARD 27(4)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2014-15AllowedDurga Apparels Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 7(4)
Delhi Bench ‘B’ benchAY 2011-12 & 2012-13AllowedPRIYAM SHARMA vs. NFAC, DELHI
Delhi Bench benchAY 2013-14AllowedShri Rajesh Kumar Vs ITO, Ward-47(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-19Partly Allowed