Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Santosh Promoters Private Limited

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Santosh Promoters Private Limited, is a broker with an allotted client code for trading in currency derivatives at MCX Stock Exchange. The assessee issued valid contract notes for online trading, and all transactions were accepted on the stock exchange platform through banking channels. The Assessing Officer (AO) added a loss of ₹1,54,10,350/- as bogus. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) deleted this addition, finding no discrepancies in the trading. The AO relied on a retracted statement and an investigation report without further corroboration. The CIT(A) also deleted an addition of ₹3,63,137/- under the head capital gain, holding it within the safe harbor limit of 5% as per Section 50C. The AO added a difference of ₹69,00,861/- between the income shown in the Profit and Loss account vis-à-vis Form 26AS, which the CIT(A) deleted, noting that the difference was due to the inclusion of service tax in Form 26AS.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Deletion of addition of ₹1,54,10,350/- by the CIT(A) as bogus loss on current year derivatives.
• 2. Deletion of addition of ₹3,63,137/- under the head capital gain by the CIT(A).
• 3. Order of CIT(A) violating Section 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 by not referring fresh documents to the AO.
• 4. Deletion of addition of ₹69,00,861/- by the CIT(A) for difference between income shown in Profit and Loss account vis-à-vis Form 26AS.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Prompt Commodities Limited Vs. ITO, Ward 12(1)

  Kolkata benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• KANNADASAN Vs. DCIT, Circle 3(2)

  KOLKATA benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Amity Pharmaceuticals Marketing vs. ITO Ward, 22(2), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2013-2014Allowed

• Siddharth Fininvest Leasing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• M/s R.S. Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Circle 11(3)

  D Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Allowed

• Ripan Halder vs. Income Tax Officer

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2016-17Allowed