Dineshbhai Parmar vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Dineshbhai Parmar, along with other co-sharers, purchased a property for Rs. 58.74 lakhs. The assessee claimed that the entire contribution was made by his father and brother, and he did not contribute any amount. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the father and brother had contributed Rs. 54.86 lakhs, and the assessee had not explained the source of the remaining Rs. 3.88 lakhs. The AO made an addition of Rs. 1.82 lakhs, which the assessee appealed against. The Tribunal found that the AO's addition was unjustified due to the smallness of the amount and the overall facts and circumstances of the case.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Addition of Rs. 1.82 lakhs by the AO

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• ADIL vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2015-16Allowed

• Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(3)(1)

  Mumbai Bench 'E', Mumbai benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Deepen Drugs vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• Shyama Devi vs. ACIT, Circle 2(2)(1), Shivalik Tower, 505, Ghaziabad

  Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Jabbar Khan Vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Mansi Gulati Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed