Dinesh Naran Patel, HUF vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The appellant, Dinesh Naran Patel, HUF, filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The appellant had deposited a large sum of cash during the demonetization period, which was considered unexplained by the Assessing Officer. The appellant argued that the cash deposits were sourced from agricultural income and income from leasing out shuttering materials, which had been declared in previous years' returns. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant had failed to provide satisfactory explanation regarding the source of cash deposits. The appellant then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the cash deposits made by the appellant during the demonetization period were sourced from agricultural income and income from leasing out shuttering materials?
• 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in rejecting the details of cash receipts/payments furnished by the appellant?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Padam Sarup Goel vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi bench

• Ajaykumar Mahadevbhai Patel Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara

  Ahmedabad bench

• Keshavlal Chaturdas Patel vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• Dhaval Dinesh Shah vs Income Tax Officer Ward 42(1)(2), Mumbai

• Amarkumar Anupbhai Desai vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Banarsi Das Gupta HUF Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(6), Delhi

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed