Skip to main content

Dinesh Mehta HUF Vs ITO Ward-30(1), Kolkata

Case No: ITA No.1042/KOL/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata
Date: 12/9/2025

Parties Involved

appellantDinesh Mehta HUF
respondentITO Ward-30(1), Kolkata

Facts Summary

This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Dinesh Mehta HUF, against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 28.02.2025 for the assessment year 2016-2017. Notice u/s.148 of the Act was issued on 23/07/2022, beyond the 3-year period, and the quantum for reopening was Rs.66,89,500/-. The assessee argued that the approval for issuing the notice beyond 3 years and for an amount above Rs.50,00,000/- should have been granted by the PCCIT, but it was granted by t

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Act beyond the 3-year period.
  • 2. Consequences of the invalid notice on the assessment order.

Precedents Relied Upon

3 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning