Sh. Dinesh Khatri Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-35(1), New Delhi

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This appeal pertains to the assessment year 2021-22. The assessee, Sh. Dinesh Khatri, could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings due to communication gaps at various levels. The learned counsel for the assessee argued that the matter should be restored back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh adjudication. The Revenue supported the action of the lower authorities, which made additions on merits.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the assessee's appeal should be restored back to the Assessing Officer due to communication gaps?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Ashish Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Smt. Mamta Arora Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(4), Ghaziabad

• Smt. Meenu Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Sh. Satinder Kaur Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(1), Delhi

• Parveen Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• Sh. Baldev Prasad Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Faridabad

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2010-11Allowed