Skip to main content

Devasagayam Gnanaselvam vs. The Income Tax Officer

Case No: I.T.A. No.1936/Chny/2024
Court: Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai
Date: 27 Sept 2024

Parties Involved

appellantDevasagayam Gnanaselvam
respondentThe Income Tax Officer

Facts Summary

Devasagayam Gnanaselvam, a pensioner, did not file an income return for the financial year 2014-15 as per the provisions of section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer found cash deposits in her accounts with Indian Overseas Bank to an extent of ₹.33,45,500/-. The assessee did not furnish any details against various notices issued under sections 148, 142(1), and 144 of the Act. The Assessing Officer treated the cash deposits as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act and added them to the total income of the assessee. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), but the appeal was dismissed for non-submission of documentary evidence. The assessee then appealed to the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, seeking an opportunity to present her case with documentary evidence.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the assessee's appeal against the order of the Assessing Officer should be allowed?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning