Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata vs. Vivek Gupta

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves an appeal by the revenue and a cross objection by the assessee, Vivek Gupta, against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata. The revenue contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credit. The assessee, Vivek Gupta, belongs to the Avima Group of Companies, which is involved in trading various products. During a survey operation, documents related to unsecured loans were found, leading the Assessing Officer to add these loans to the assessee's income. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted this addition, noting that the statements relied upon by the AO were retracted and that no addition could be made without corroborative material. The assessee repaid the loans with interest in the next financial year. The tribunal found that the assessee had provided necessary evidence regarding the loans and upheld the deletion of the addition. Another issue involved the addition of Rs. 2,41,00,000/- by the AO under section 69A of the Act concerning offshore entities, which the Ld. CIT(A) partly deleted, sustaining an addition of Rs. 19,28,000/-. The tribunal found that the lower authorities had placed undue reliance on retracted statements and that the offshore entities were separate legal entities assessed in their respective countries, leading to the deletion of the entire addition.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- as unsecured loan treated as unexplained cash credit.
• 2. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 12,500/- by the Ld.CIT(A) as made by the AO u/s 69C of the Act towards commission expenditure for obtaining the bogus loans.
• 3. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 61,151/- made under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act on account of interest paid on alleged bogus loans.
• 4. Deletion of addition of Rs. 2,41,00,000/- and sustaining addition of Rs. 19,28,000/- by the Ld.CIT(A) concerning offshore entities.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• ITO, Delhi vs. Shann Jewellers

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2017-18Dismissed

• DCIT, CC-4(3), Kolkata vs. Avima Exports Pvt. Ltd.

• Nouvelle Securities Pvt Ltd Vs. The A.C.I.T

  Delhi ‘E’ Bench benchAY 2016-17Dismissed

• Revenue vs. Manju Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• ACIT, Circle 52 (1) vs. Singhania Alu Foil Containers

• DCIT vs. Sujit Arya

  D Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2014-15Dismissed