Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP vs. Assistant Director of Income tax
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, primarily concerning the validity of the order, credit for tax deducted at source, and the levy of interest under various sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal was heard by Shri Om Prakash Kant, Accountant Member, and Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Judicial Member. The assessee's counsel argued that the order was invalid and that the Assessing Officer should grant full credit for tax deducted at source. The Revenue's counsel did not object to the submission of the assessee's counsel.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Validity of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
- 2. Credit for tax deducted at source amounting to Rs.24,18,04,355/-
- 3. Levy of interest of Rs.25,56,711 u/s. 234A of the Act
- 4. Levy of interest of Rs.6,91,40,622 u/s. 234B of the Act
- 5. Levy of interest of Rs.1,92,20,835 u/s. 234C of the Act
- 6. General ground of appeal
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Lakshmi Narayan vs. Income Tax Officer
Mumbai benchOm Prakash Agrawal HUF vs. ITO
Jaipur benchKarthik Lakshman Vs. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward-1(2), Chennai
ITA No. 5693/Mum/2025 & CO No. 306/MUM/2025 (A.Y. 2013-14)
Mumbai 'C' Bench benchAY 2013-14DismissedSmt. Urmila Dhelia v/s Income Tax Officer
Mumbai benchAY 2011-12Partly AllowedOm Prakash(Deceased) Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)