DCIT(Exemption), Circle-1(1), Delhi Vs. Ishan Educational Research Society
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Ishan Educational Research Society, is a charitable society registered under Section 12A and approved under Section 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It filed its return of income for AY 2015-16 declaring Nil income. In AY 2009-10, the assessee set aside Rs. 3.55 crores for extending its building to provide hostel facilities. By AY 2013-14, it utilized Rs. 1,45,61,317/- but could not utilize the remaining Rs. 2,09,38,683/- due to an injunction order by the Delhi High Court. The Assessing Officer reopened the case for AY 2015-16 and sought to tax the unutilized amount. The assessee argued that it could not utilize the funds due to disputes and court cases, and relied on a High Court decision confirmed by the Supreme Court to set off earlier years’ excess expenditure against the unutilized fund.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the ld CIT(A) was justified in holding that the assessee would be liable to tax on the unspent accumulated fund pertaining to AY 2009-10 in AY 2015-16.
- 2. The validity of assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act for AY 2015-16.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
J.B. Petit High School for Girls Vs. CIT (Exemptions)
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2022-23AllowedThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Circle – 1, Bengaluru. Vs. M/s. Karnataka Institute of Diabetology
Bangalore benchAY 2017-18, 2018-19DismissedGopmahal Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-38, Midnapore
Kolkata ‘SMC’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2015-16 & 2017-18Partly AllowedShri Narayan Jan Kalyan Ewam Gramin Vikas Samiti Barnahal Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, 205261 Vs. Income Tax Office [Exemption], Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedKumar Memorial Educational Trust vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward, Trichy
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. Marriott International Inc.