DCIT, Circle 4(1)(1), Aligarh. Vs. Bharat Varshney
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Bharat Varshney, runs a proprietary business in the name of M/s. G.M.C. Enterprises, which deals in scrap trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals. For the assessment year 2022-23, the assessee filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 31,42,150/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny under CASS due to low income from TCS receipts. The Assessing Officer issued a show cause notice to the assessee regarding unexplained credits amounting to Rs. 6,77,42,657/-. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The revenue then filed an appeal before the tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition without examining the assessee's claim of a short loan of Rs. 1,61,75,000/- and its repayment.
- 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in ignoring the issue of sundry debtors to the extent of Rs. 1,65,25,255/- during the year under consideration.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Suman Lata Lamba Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Hisar, Haryana-125001
ITA No.6546/M/2024, ITA No.6549/M/2024, ITA No.6779/M/2024
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12Partly AllowedUtpal Sarkar Vs. D.C.I.T., Circle - 23, Hooghly
Kolkata 'A' Bench benchAY 2013-14Partly AllowedSapra Iron Store vs. Income Tax Officer
Delhi Bench 'C', Delhi benchAY 2012-13 & 2013-14AllowedIncome Tax Officer vs Anil Kumar Jain
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedPR & Co. vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Erode