DCIT, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Vs National Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s order dated 28.10.2024, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of Rs.3,38,72,500/- in the assessee’s hands as unexplained payments based on a search/survey action conducted on the premises of M/s Radico Khaitan and a statement recorded from Mr. R. K. Miglani (General Secretary of Uttar Pradesh Distillery Association). The learned CIT(A) reversed this addition, stating that the issue had been decided in favor of the assessee and against the department in previous matters.…
Decision in favour of
Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.3,38,72,500/- on account of unexplained payments.
- 2. Request to add or amend the grounds of appeal before the ITAT is finally heard or disposed of.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Bundelkhand University, Financial Officer, New Building, Near Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh-284128 Vs. Assessment Unit/DCIT (Exemption), Income Tax Department CGO, Complex-II, Purani Hapur Chungi Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201001
Agra benchMohd. Ikram Vs. ITO
SMC Bench, Delhi benchAY 2012-13AllowedPaharhati O Uttar Memari Cooperative Agricultural Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Ward-2(2), Burdwan
Kolkata ‘C’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2017-18AllowedM/s. 45 Bus Route Owner Association Vs. ITO, Ward-33(2), Kolkata
Kolkata ‘A’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Partly AllowedIncome Tax Officer vs Kulbir Singh Arora
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedSundeep Dhuper vs. ACIT, Circle-3
B Bench, Delhi benchAY 2008-09Allowed