Chimey Yangzom Athuptsang Vs. ITO, Ward 3(2)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Chimey Yangzom Athuptsang, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 15.07.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) under Section 250 of the Act was without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, thus violating natural justice. There was also no compliance before the AO due to reasons beyond the control of the assessee. The learned Departmental Representative did not object to the prayer made by the assessee.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) was without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, thus violating natural justice.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Seth Soorajmull Jalan Girls College Vs. ITO, Ward 1(3), Exemption

  Kolkata benchAY 2019-20Allowed

• Rajeev Nain Mishra Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1), Gangtok

  Kolkata benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• Keka Sinha Vs. DCIT, Circle 43, Kolkata

  Kolkata benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Vinod Kumar vs. ITO, Ward 2(2)(2), Village Nagla, Sukhi Post, Firozabad. Mustafabad, Jasrana, Firozabad – 205 147 (Uttar Pradesh)

  Agra bench

• GAURAV GUPTA VS. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2019-20Allowed

• S. Net Freight (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench ‘G’ New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed