Bhavesh Haribhai Mundiya vs. ITO WD 2(2)(1)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Bhavesh Haribhai Mundiya, filed an income return for the assessment year 2013-14 declaring a total income of Rs.1,98,090. The case was selected for scrutiny, and during search proceedings related to other individuals, information was gathered alleging that the assessee was a beneficiary of accommodation entries amounting to Rs.4,30,77,687. The Assessing Officer formed a view based on this information and issued notices under sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee did not respond to these notices, leading to the completion of the assessment with the addition of the unexplained money as income. Penalty proceedings were also initiated under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee appealed against the assessment and penalty orders to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), which were dismissed. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the matter should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication?
• 2. Whether the penalty order should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Sphere Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Surat bench

• Aulad Husain vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Allahabad bench

• Anil Kumar Singhal vs. ITO, Ward 63 (3)

  Delhi bench

• Sh. Dinesh Khatri Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-35(1), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2021-22Allowed

• Jignesh Pravinbhai Rana vs ITO, Ward 1(2), Jaipur

  Jaipur bench

• Debendra Kumar Sahoo vs. Income Tax Officer, Kendrapara

  Cuttack bench