Bharat Bullion vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves cross-appeals by both the assessee, Bharat Bullion, and the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee has appealed against the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) under sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in the trading business of Bullion/Gold Bar, has contested the additions made on account of cash deposits found in their bank account. The Revenue has appealed against the deletion of certain additions by the CIT(A). The tribunal has examined the sales data and cash deposits of the assessee for the assessment years under consideration and the years preceding and succeeding it.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition for cash deposits amounting to Rs.3,36,29,000/- u/s.69 of the Act?
• 2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs.57,82,000/- as unexplained credit u/s.68 of the Act?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• Aditi Enterprises vs ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• ITA Nos. 2167 to 2170/Ahd/2024 [DCIT vs. AIA Engineering Limited]

  Ahmedabad bench

• Meghna Banga Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-7

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Shri Hitesh Ugamraj Mehta vs. Assessing Officer

  Mumbai bench

• Sh. Rakesh Bansal vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-II(4), Faridabad, Haryana-121006

  Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2009-10Partly Allowed

• Income Tax Officer, 4(1), New Delhi-110014. Vs. Bhasin Jewellers Private Limited

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2017-18Remanded