ITA 360/HYD/2026 BHAGYA AMMULA

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, BHAGYA AMMULA, appealed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which confirmed the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The reassessment was based on substantial cash transactions in the assessee's bank account and the sale of immovable property. The assessee argued that the cash deposits were fully explained and sourced from identifiable family property transactions, accumulated savings, and an amount received on lifting a chit. The assessee also contended that the long-term capital gains from the sale of the property should not have been assessed in her hands as the property was sold by her daughters.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer.
• 2. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in treating cash deposits as unexplained income.
• 3. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in treating the sale consideration as long-term capital gains in the hands of the assessee.
• 4. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in not accepting the source of accumulated savings.
• 5. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in not accepting the source of the amount received on lifting a chit.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Shashi Kant Chaurasia Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19 & 2019-20Partly Allowed

• Mrs. Charanjit Kaur Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-69(1), New Delhi

• Shubira Prasad Vs Income Tax Officer

• Surendra Garg, HUF vs Income Tax Officer 19(3)(4), Mumbai

• Kiran Kumar Rasala vs. ITO

  Hyderabad bench

• Mrs. Nirmalaben Popatlal Shah v/s ITO, 19(2)(4), Mumbai

  Mumbai bench