Skip to main content

ITA Nos. 5982/D/2024, 1994/D/2022, 5991/D/2024, 5992/D/2024, 6034/D/2024, 1186/D/2022, 422/D/2021 & 1813/D/2022

Case No: ITA Nos. 5982/D/2024, 1994/D/2022, 5991/D/2024, 5992/D/2024, 6034/D/2024, 1186/D/2022, 422/D/2021 & 1813/D/2022
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘I’
Date: 1/28/2026

Parties Involved

appellantMMTC-PAMP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-16(1)
appellantGOOD YEAR INDIA LTD.
respondentACIT (OSD), Circle 10(1)
appellantBERGEN ENGINES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-4(2)
appellantESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-1, Range-51
appellantYANMAR AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-4(2)
appellantIKEA INDIA P. LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-10(1)
appellantEVALUESERVE.COM PVT. LIMITED
respondentACIT, Circle-9(2)
appellantVEDANTA LIMITED
respondentDCIT, Circle-25(1)

Facts Summary

The present adjudication involves eight assessees who have challenged the validity of the assessment order on the ground of limitation considering the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. All these appeals involve the common issue of limitation and are being disposed of through this single order. The assessees have raised the issue of limitation based on the decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) Ltd. The Revenue has objected to the adjudication of these appeals, arguing that the issue is sub-judice before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and has not reached finality. The assessees have relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Roca Bathroom Products (P) Ltd., which was not stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the limitation for passing the final assessment order under section 144C(13) of the Act is to be seen only with reference to the timeline specified under section 144C of the Act only without referring to provisions of section 153 of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning