Skip to main content

Basavaraj Mahalingayya Hiremath vs. ITO

Case No: ITA No.2024/Bang/2024
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH: BANGALORE
Date: 1/30/2025

Parties Involved

appellantBasavaraj Mahalingayya Hiremath
respondentITO

Facts Summary

The assessee, Basavaraj Mahalingayya Hiremath, an employee of Toyota Kirloskar Pvt. Ltd, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs.7,72,350/-. His case was selected for limited scrutiny to examine cash deposits during the demonetization period. Notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued, but the assessee did not respond. Consequently, the assessment was completed under section 144 of the Act, treating the cash deposits of Rs.6,71,291/- as

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned?

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning