Skip to main content

Bapatla Mahila Mutually Aided Co-op. Thrift Society Limited vs. Income Tax Officer

Case No: I.T.A. No. 321/Viz/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench
Date: 25 Sept 2024

Parties Involved

appellantBapatla Mahila Mutually Aided Co-op. Thrift Society Limited
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bapatla

Facts Summary

The assessee, Bapatla Mahila Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The assessee had made cash deposits of Rs. 1,33,48,085/- in the savings bank account during the financial year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had not filed its return of income, and thus, issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee filed its return of income on 28.05.2021, which was treated as invalid by the CPC, Bangalore. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment proceedings under section 144 of the Act and determined the total income at Rs.1,42,06,582/-. The assessee appealed against the order of the Assessing Officer before the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which dismissed the appeal ex-parte.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. The reopening of assessment is bad in law as the notice U/s. 148 dated 29/03/2021 was issued on 01/04/2021 without following the procedure prescribed under the new law effective from 01/04/2021 consequently the order passed U/s. 147 is null and void.
  • 2. The assessment unit, NFAC, Delhi is not justified in treating the deposits of Rs. 1,33,40,085/- cash deposited in the bank account of the assessee as unexplained money U/s. 69A of the Act and levying the tax thereon U/s. 115BBE of the Act.
  • 3. The Assessment Unit, NFAC, Delhi is not justif ied in treating the gross income of Rs. 8,58,497/- as unexplained money U/s. 69A and levying the tax thereon U/s. 115BBE of the Act.
  • 4. The period for which interest U/s. 234A is levied is not justif ied as it does not take into account the period during which it is not possible for the assessee to file a valid return of income.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning