Baboo Lal Nimoria vs. Income Tax Officer 3(1), Mathura

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Baboo Lal Nimoria, filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Additional Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 19.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee declared a total income of Rs.9,82,920/- on 24.09.2011 as an individual. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee is a Civil Contractor working as the Proprietor of Ajay Construction. The assessee declared a net profit of 3.07% of the gross receipts amounting to Rs.3,15,19,362/- received from Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. (HCCL). The Assessing Officer rejected the books of account and estimated the income at 8% of the gross receipts. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and subsequently to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT remanded the issue back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide afresh.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the rejection of the appellant's books of accounts under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
• 2. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in estimating the net profit @ 8% of gross turnover.
• 3. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to consider or apply the settled judicial principle that, upon rejection of books, profit estimation must be based on the assessee's past history and comparable cases.
• 4. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not appreciating binding precedents laid down by Hon'ble High Courts and Tribunals, which stress the need to estimate net profit based on past accepted results of the assessee and similar industry standards.
• 5. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal on the basis that certain details were not submitted, without granting adequate opportunity of hearing.
• 6. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has merely endorsed the findings of the Assessing Officer without independent application of mind or recording detailed reasons addressing the appellant's arguments and submissions.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• JPR Balaji Infra Private Limited Vs DCIT

• Sai Chandra Construction Vs. DCIT

  DELHI BENCH ‘B’ NEW DELHI benchAY 2012-13, 2014-15Dismissed

• Girdhari Lal Kedar Nath Singhal vs. ITO

  Agra bench

• Punit Jain vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 51(5)

  Delhi Bench 'F', Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Kasturi Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, NFAC, Delhi

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Mohd. Sami Alam vs. Income Tax Officer

  SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed