Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai vs Jaya P Patel

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

During the search proceedings on 28/4/2006, certain paintings were found and inventorised by the department. The original assessment was made under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and was framed on 29/12/2008, determining the total income at Rs.25,64,22,850/-. An addition was made in the assessment order under section 69 of the Act, amounting to Rs.25,54,60,000/- being the value of alleged unexplained investments in paintings. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-49, Mumbai, which was dismissed by an order dated 28/12/2010. The assessee then filed an appeal before the ITAT, Mumbai, which passed an order on 8/8/2014. The matter was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 254 of the Act, determining the income at Rs.14,87,92,850/-. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who partly allowed the appeal. The Assessing Officer in the remand report verified and accepted the documentary evidences furnished by the assessee and submitted that the assessee could not furnish details of A2 paintings. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed a relief of Rs.14,67,80,000/- by sustaining the addition of Rs.10,50,000/-. The revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, which was dismissed.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of Rs 14,67,80,000/- made on account of unexplained investments in paintings.
• 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of Rs 14,67,80,000/- on the basis of the report of the Assessing Officer which merely reproduced the assessee's contention.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• ACIT, Circle 25 (1) vs. Vipul Limited

  Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi benchAY 2007-08Dismissed

• Mohan Bhaguji Nanaware vs. Ward 1(1), Kalyan

  Mumbai bench

• Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panipat. Vs. Santosh Ahlawat

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Partly Allowed

• DCIT vs. EXL Service.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd.

  Delhi Bench ‘B’ benchAY 2018-19Partly Allowed

• Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata Vs. PHPL Properties Pvt. Ltd.

  Kolkata ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed

• ACIT WARD-22(1), NEW DELHI Vs. S.M. FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED

  Delhi bench