Archana Sachan Vs. Income tax Officer, Ward-5(1), Gautam Budha Nagar

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This appeal arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the 'CIT(A)/NFAC'], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1081434721(1), dated 03.10.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The learned counsel for the assessee submits that due to communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings. The Revenue supports the action of the lower authorities making additions on merits.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts due to communication gaps?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Choice Fashion Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-60(6), Delhi

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Sh. Sunder Lal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-68(8), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• Subhadra Bhardwaj vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(3), Gurgaon

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Jay Iber Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• Sh. Baldev Prasad Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Faridabad

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2010-11Allowed

• Amit Bajaj HUF vs Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, New Delhi benchAY 2020-21Allowed