Skip to main content

AMIT GUPTA (HUF) Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER

Case No: ITA No.5585/Del/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Bench: DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Date: 2/19/2026

Parties Involved

appellantAMIT GUPTA (HUF)
respondentINCOME TAX OFFICER

Facts Summary

The assessee, AMIT GUPTA (HUF), filed an original return of income for the AY 2013-14 declaring total income of Rs.1,05,280/- and had shown income from long term capital gain and other sources in its ITR. The case was reopened and notice u/s 148 was issued to the appellant. The appellant filed ROI on 23.09.2021. The short issue in the case is that the notice issued u/s 148 is time-barred in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajeev Bansal vs Union of India.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the notice issued u/s 148 is time-barred.

Precedents Relied Upon

3 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning