All Odisha State Bank Officers’ Cooperative Society Limited, IDCO Towers, Bhubaneswar Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1), Bhubaneswar
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 10.5.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-2014 for the assessment year 2014-15. The appeal is time barred by 43 days. The assessee has filed condonation petition dated 14.8.2024 supported by affidavit, stating the reason that the assessee was ill and bed ridden from 10.7.2024 to 13.8.2024, the appeal could not be filed within the due date and, therefore, there was delay of 43 days. It is submitted that there was no malafide intention in delaying the appeal. At the time of hearing, ld AR of the assessee reiterated the submission stated in the petition and prayed for condoning the delay. After considering the petition, we are of the view that the reason given in the petition has not been found to be false, therefore, we condone the delay of 43 days and admit the appeal for hearing.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned?
- 2. Whether the assessee was given adequate opportunities to produce evidence?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
M/s. Jay Granites Pvt. Ltd. v. The DCIT, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai
Late Ratanchand Manoharmal Rep. by Legal Heirs M. Chandan Bala & Others Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 17(2), Chennai
Padmini Retailers Private Ltd. vs. ITO Ward, 10(2)
Kolkata benchAY 2012-13AllowedVGN Projects Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle-3, Chennai
Priya Sudhir Gupta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai benchJCIT(IN-SITU), Kolkata Vs Warren Tea Limited
KOLKATA benchAY 2019-2020Dismissed