Skip to main content

AJAY PRATAP RAMAN VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(5), GHAZIABAD

Case No: ITA NO. 4601/Del/2024
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI
Date: 2/21/2025

Parties Involved

appellantAJAY PRATAP RAMAN
respondentINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(5), GHAZIABAD

Facts Summary

The assessee, Ajay Pratap Raman, made cash deposits of Rs. 10,00,000/- in his bank account with Bank of Baroda, Ghaziabad during the demonetization period (09.11.2016 to 30.12.2016). The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had not filed a return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 voluntarily. Consequently, a notice under section 142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee on 10.3.2018, requiring him to furnish the return of income for AY 2017-18 on or before 31.3.2018. However

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether a notice under section 148 of the Act was served upon the assessee.
  • 2. Whether the AO and CIT(A) provided proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

1 more legal issue analysed in this judgement.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning