Skip to main content

Ahsan Usman Raeen vs. ITO

Case No: I.T.A. No. 3811/Mum/2023 (A.Y. 2012-13)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 'A' Bench
Date: 9/20/2024

Parties Involved

AppellantAhsan Usman Raeen
RespondentDepartment

Facts Summary

The Revenue instituted an appeal before the ITAT aggrieved by the appellate order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) with the following grounds of appeal: 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of capital gain of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by the AO, holding that the transfer was made by the partnership firm, ignoring the fact that the sale deed was entered into by the assessee and had no mention of the name of the partnership firm. 2. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of capital gain of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by the AO, holding that the asset was transferred to the partnership firm by the assessee, ignoring the fact that no conveyance deed was entered in this regard and that the sale was effected in the name of the assessee and the amount was also received in the account of the assessee. 3. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,95,51,000/- made by the AO on the transfer of property, holding that the plot was handed over to the Municipal corporation in lieu of additional FSI and hence no profit was involved, ignoring the provision of section 2(47) of the Act that exchange is also considered as transfer of property and hence it attracts section 45 of the Act.

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of capital gain of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by the AO.
  • 2. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of capital gain of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by the AO.
  • 3. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,95,51,000/- made by the AO on the transfer of property.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Ahsan Usman Raeen vs. ITO | I.T.A. No. 3811/Mum/2023 (A.Y. 2012-13) | 2024 | Opakhya