ITA No. 4621/Del/2024 (AY 2011-12)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This appeal by the Revenue is against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-43 Delhi [in short “the Ld. CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2011-12. The Revenue raised several grounds of appeal, including the deletion of additions by the Ld. CIT(A) without proper examination of documentary evidence, misinterpretation of Section 10(33) of the Act, and failure of the assessee to provide crucial information during the assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer (AO) had completed the assessment by passing an exparte order under section 144 of the Act, against which the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and submitted additional evidences. The Ld. CIT(A) called for a Remand Report from the AO, which was not submitted, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO. The Revenue is now appealing this decision, requesting that the matter be remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication considering all additional evidences.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions without proper examination of documentary evidence?
• 2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in concluding that the AO had no tangible material to support the assessment?
• 3. Whether the CIT(A) misinterpreted the scope and application of Section 10(33) of the Act?
• 4. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in disregarding the AO’s findings regarding the failure of the assessee to provide crucial information?
• 5. Whether the CIT(A)’s order, which is based on the conclusion that the assessee did not sell shares of the alleged penny stock, is legally tenable?
• 6. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not considering the fact that the assessee failed to discharge the burden of proof regarding the source of the capital gains under section 69 of the Act?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• ITO, WARD 19(1) vs. ORIENTAL STITCH PVT. LTD.

  Delhi Bench ‘E’ : New Delhi benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• ITA No. 3429/Del/2024

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Dismissed

• ITA No. 5818/DEL/2017 & ITA No. 5957/Del/2017

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13Dismissed

• Mahesh Kumar Choudhary vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-36(1), Kolkata

  SMC Bench Kolkata benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• INCOME TAX OFFICER VS. VISHAP BAJAJ

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Stargaze Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-6(3)(1)