Skip to main content

ACIT (Exemptions), Circle-Jaipur vs Navratan Vidha Mandir Shiksha Samiti

Case No: ITA No. 201/JP/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur
Date: 27 Sept 2024

Parties Involved

appellantACIT (Exemptions), Circle-Jaipur
respondentNavratan Vidha Mandir Shiksha Samiti

Facts Summary

The case involves an appeal by the ACIT (Exemptions), Circle-Jaipur against an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee, Navratan Vidha Mandir Shiksha Samiti, a registered educational institution, filed a return declaring nil income under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The ACIT raised several grounds of appeal, including the classification of development fees as capital receipts, the characterization of advances given to other educational institutions, and the disallowance of expenses. The assessee filed a cross-objection to the appeal. The tribunal analyzed the grounds of appeal and the submissions of both parties, ultimately dismissing the appeal and allowing the cross-objection.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified, ignoring the facts and circumstances of the present case and without applying the correct preposition of law.
  • 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified in treating receipts of development fund as capital receipts/corpus donation.
  • 3. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified in treating the receipts of development fund as capital/corpus receipts.
  • 4. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified in holding advance of Rs.1,62,86,091/- given to other trust cannot be treated as investment or deposit.
  • 5. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified in allowing exemption u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act while misappropriation of the funds done by the assessee by utilizing them other than the mode prescribed u/s 11(5) of the Income-tax Act.
  • 6. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is justified in reducing disallowance of 20% out of total application of Rs.3,03,53,582/- to extend of 10% on Rs.3,03,53,582/- ie Rs.30,35,358/- without any proper reason.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

3 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning