Makarpura Industrial Estate Coop. Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-1, Ludhiana dated 20.03.2025 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2021-22. The order in question arose from an order issued under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the CPC dated 16.11.2022. The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs.2,69,96,801/- made by the CPC on account of contingent liability debited in P&L Account as reported by the Auditor in the tax audit report. The assessee supported the order of the Ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs.2,69,96,801/- pertaining to DAE fund and guarantee, which were contingent liabilities.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.2,69,96,801/- made by the CPC on account of contingent liability.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Similar Judgements
Grindwell Norten Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
ITA No.4000/Mum/2025
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2015-16DismissedJCIT, Circle 21 (1) vs. Rajasthan Explosives Chemicals Ltd.
Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17Partly AllowedHowe Robinson Shipping India Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, CPC, Income Tax Office, Bengaluru
Delhi Bench 'B' benchAY 2020-21AllowedHooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited vs. DCIT, Circle(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2015-16AllowedDCIT, Exemption-Circle, Ghaziabad Vs M/s Meerut Development Authority
Delhi Bench ‘E’, New Delhi benchAY 2014-15Dismissed