Abdul Kadir Ibrahim Antule vs. ITO, Ward-1, Panvel

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Abdul Kadir Ibrahim Antule, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2013-14. The assessee challenged the validity of the assessment order, claiming that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the assessment order without serving a valid notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee also argued that the reassessment was based on vague reasons and that the cash deposits in the bank account were genuine business receipts. The revenue, represented by the Departmental Representative, relied on the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the reassessment order is valid as the notice under section 148 was not served on the assessee.
• 2. Whether the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment are sufficient.
• 3. Whether the addition of Rs.12,46,400/- made by the Assessing Officer is justified.
• 4. Whether the addition of Rs. 12,46,400/- made by the Assessing Officer is legally correct.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Jabbar Mattul Abdul vs. DCIT (International Taxation)

  Cochin bench

• Raghubir Singh Punia vs. ITO

  Delhi bench

• M/s. Pee Aar Securities Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle 14 (1), AG-20, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi

• Shaival Comcon LLP vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Jashandeep Singh Sidhu Patti Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Bathinda

  Amritsar bench

• Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin vs. DCIT, Circle 17(1), Mumbai

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed