A. Alankamony (HUF) vs. The Income Tax Officer
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, A. Alankamony (HUF), filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, denying the concessional rate of tax under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The denial was due to the non-filing of Form-10IE within the due date. The assessee argued that they attempted to file the form at the time of filing the return but faced technical issues with the web portal. The assessee provided a screenshot as evidence of their attempt. The assessee cited a decision from the ITAT, Pune Bench, to support their claim that the requirement to file Form-10IE is directory and not mandatory. The Departmental Representative relied on previous orders from lower authorities.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the requirement to file Form-10IE is mandatory or directory?
- 2. Whether the assessee is entitled to the concessional rate of tax under section 115BAC?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Murugapandian (HUF) vs. DCIT, Circle -1(1), Salem
Abid Ali Khan Educational Trust vs. DCIT
Hyderabad benchHorizon HGE Electronic Equipment India Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT
Delhi "B" Bench: New Delhi benchAY 2020-21AllowedJayantilal Moolchand Vanigota Vs ITO, Ward-42(2)(3), Mumbai
SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2023-24AllowedSindhu Resettlement Corporation Ltd. v/s DCIT, Circle-2(3)(1)
Mumbai benchKumar Saurabh vs. Income Tax Officer, Wd-4(1), Patna
Patna bench